Re: [IN-STOCK] Dipo Electronic 19 port USB hubs [As low as $130 usd each]
Hello guys,
so I have test a little bit he HUB, and I think its a good quality
Only the voltage is on the lower end of the USB standard.
My Devices: 10 x Antminer U2+ (~ 1,8 GH/s / anu-freq:225), 8 x Bfx2 (~ 3,5 GH/s / bxm-bits:53)
Here my table:
So when the voltage is OK, I can say a good result about the measurement. I hope for the permanent load about 16 A is for the HUB no problem?
At time my results from the Cgminer, one Bfx2 is a little bit slower...
regards
so I have test a little bit he HUB, and I think its a good quality
Only the voltage is on the lower end of the USB standard.
My Devices: 10 x Antminer U2+ (~ 1,8 GH/s / anu-freq:225), 8 x Bfx2 (~ 3,5 GH/s / bxm-bits:53)
Here my table:
| USB port | Device | Voltage | amperage |
| 1 | Bfx2 | 4,45 | 1,01 |
| 2 | Antminer | 4,55 | 0,61 |
| 3 | Bfx2 | 4,40 | 1,05 |
| 4 | Antminer | 4,50 | 0,62 |
| 5 | Antminer | 4,60 | 0,64 |
| 6 | Bfx2 | 4,40 | 1,05 |
| 7 | Antminer | 4,60 | 0,64 |
| 8 | Bfx2 | 4,45 | 1,02 |
| 9 | Bfx2 | 4,45 | 1,07 |
| 10 | Antminer | 4,60 | 0,61 |
| 11 | Bfx2 | 4,45 | 1,01 |
| 12 | Antminer | 4,55 | 0,61 |
| 13 | Antminer | 4,65 | 0,59 |
| 14 | Bfx2 | 4,45 | 1,07 |
| 15 | Antminer | 4,65 | 0,58 |
| 16 | Bfx2 | 4,61 | 1,01 |
| 17 | Antminer | 4,55 | 0,61 |
| 18 | Antminer | 4,50 | 0,61 |
| 19 | Empty for Pi later | ||
At time my results from the Cgminer, one Bfx2 is a little bit slower...
Quote
0: ANU 0: | 1.770G/1.749Gh/s | A: 624 R: 0 HW:56 WU: 19.4/m
1: ANU 1: | 1.745G/1.758Gh/s | A: 336 R: 0 HW:39 WU: 18.1/m
2: ANU 2: | 1.756G/1.749Gh/s | A: 368 R: 0 HW:56 WU: 17.5/m
3: ANU 3: | 1.785G/1.752Gh/s | A: 416 R: 0 HW:42 WU: 18.6/m
4: ANU 4: | 1.787G/1.756Gh/s | A: 528 R: 0 HW:49 WU: 19.0/m
5: ANU 5: | 1.785G/1.760Gh/s | A: 336 R: 0 HW:35 WU: 17.8/m
6: ANU 6: | 1.756G/1.749Gh/s | A: 464 R: 0 HW:51 WU: 19.0/m
7: ANU 7: | 1.671G/1.744Gh/s | A: 592 R: 0 HW:58 WU: 18.5/m
8: BXM 0: | 3.640G/3.451Gh/s | A:1024 R:16 HW: 0 WU: 50.8/m
9: BXM 1: | 2.759G/2.733Gh/s | A: 880 R:32 HW: 0 WU: 39.1/m
10: BXM 2: | 3.672G/3.689Gh/s | A:1152 R:32 HW: 0 WU: 52.1/m
11: BXM 3: | 3.514G/3.389Gh/s | A: 912 R:32 HW: 0 WU: 49.6/m
12: BXM 4: | 3.464G/3.326Gh/s | A:1232 R: 0 HW: 0 WU: 48.9/m
13: BXM 5: | 3.838G/3.825Gh/s | A:1456 R: 0 HW: 0 WU: 54.2/m
14: BXM 6: | 3.696G/3.786Gh/s | A:1424 R: 0 HW: 0 WU: 52.9/m
15: BXM 7: | 3.298G/3.604Gh/s | A:1088 R:64 HW: 0 WU: 50.6/m
16: ANU 8: | 1.770G/1.755Gh/s | A: 352 R: 0 HW:54 WU: 17.9/m
17: ANU 9: | 1.535G/1.751Gh/s | A: 400 R: 0 HW:46 WU: 17.4/m
1: ANU 1: | 1.745G/1.758Gh/s | A: 336 R: 0 HW:39 WU: 18.1/m
2: ANU 2: | 1.756G/1.749Gh/s | A: 368 R: 0 HW:56 WU: 17.5/m
3: ANU 3: | 1.785G/1.752Gh/s | A: 416 R: 0 HW:42 WU: 18.6/m
4: ANU 4: | 1.787G/1.756Gh/s | A: 528 R: 0 HW:49 WU: 19.0/m
5: ANU 5: | 1.785G/1.760Gh/s | A: 336 R: 0 HW:35 WU: 17.8/m
6: ANU 6: | 1.756G/1.749Gh/s | A: 464 R: 0 HW:51 WU: 19.0/m
7: ANU 7: | 1.671G/1.744Gh/s | A: 592 R: 0 HW:58 WU: 18.5/m
8: BXM 0: | 3.640G/3.451Gh/s | A:1024 R:16 HW: 0 WU: 50.8/m
9: BXM 1: | 2.759G/2.733Gh/s | A: 880 R:32 HW: 0 WU: 39.1/m
10: BXM 2: | 3.672G/3.689Gh/s | A:1152 R:32 HW: 0 WU: 52.1/m
11: BXM 3: | 3.514G/3.389Gh/s | A: 912 R:32 HW: 0 WU: 49.6/m
12: BXM 4: | 3.464G/3.326Gh/s | A:1232 R: 0 HW: 0 WU: 48.9/m
13: BXM 5: | 3.838G/3.825Gh/s | A:1456 R: 0 HW: 0 WU: 54.2/m
14: BXM 6: | 3.696G/3.786Gh/s | A:1424 R: 0 HW: 0 WU: 52.9/m
15: BXM 7: | 3.298G/3.604Gh/s | A:1088 R:64 HW: 0 WU: 50.6/m
16: ANU 8: | 1.770G/1.755Gh/s | A: 352 R: 0 HW:54 WU: 17.9/m
17: ANU 9: | 1.535G/1.751Gh/s | A: 400 R: 0 HW:46 WU: 17.4/m
regards
Those readings are Incorrect . there is no way they should be down at 4.5v
RF