It's not so much the strengths of the devs or the community, but the principles on which they stand and adhere to.
No amount of promotion will help without a solid foundation. You cannot polish a turd.
I am not a dev. Please explain precisely what makes it a "turd"
All cryptos are copy/paste of previous coins - all are subject to the problems I have highlighted. All of them are potentially turds. Just an anology, I'm not saying Libertycoin is specifically a turd amongst good cryptos, that's a misinterpretation.
In order to move forward, a new philosophy needs to be created.
Reference : Thatcherism, 1980's.
The old order needed to be uprooted, examined and re-assessed. A new foundation was required for the future.
Does Libertycoin want to follow the old ways or create something new?
Anonimity is not a new way forward, it is merely another coat of paint on the crumbling wall of cryptos.
In it's current state, Libertycoin is not Liberty - it is Aristocracy, hiding behind a name, no different like any other coin, ruled by an elite.
Boomslang why do you keep using 1980's thatcherism for your analogies? Are you English? Because I am from the industrial North, and I've been directly affected by the shit you are talking about. You mentioned the coal mines earlier and now this, and my problem is that you are making really bullshit statements, "The old order needed to be uprooted, examined and re-assessed. A new foundation was required for the future." This is nonsense, the old order was not replaced by a new and improved order, the new order was installed so as to only benefit the elite - Thatcher's friends and sponsors, so how the hell is this a relevant analogy?? It's the complete opposite way around, before Thatcher there were trade unions and community spirit, after Thatcher there was rife unemployment, the rich got richer and the poor got poorer. You are making sloppy generalised statements and not even thinking about your words, something you have constantly been accusing others of.
Why are you still here anyway?...