In effect, this would "make the rich more rich", and small NGOs with little donations receive little..
I guess the readjustment, should that be in the books, is defined by the manpower bitcoin100 has..
Well, the "rich getting richer" is probably outweighed by the opportunity little organizations have to make their donators donate in bitcoin. At least for the moment. But the distribution also doesn't have to linearly match the donations, one could easily find a formula to prefer smaller organizations.I guess the readjustment, should that be in the books, is defined by the manpower bitcoin100 has..
And the manpower issue is a general one for the Bitcoin100, no doubt about that. Unfortunately, I don't have an easy solution for that
