"There is no such thing as zero trust."
That I was saying. There is needed trust, this online world requires it (now). But why unnecessarily increase the need of trust?
It's not "unnecessarily" as it significantly increases security for most users by allowing them to use unique and strong passwords for every site and keeping passwords more secure on the hard drive as they are encrypted. It's far more likely that people who don't use password managers are either reusing passwords on more than one site, using weak passwords, keep them insecure on a notepad or email or forgetting/losing them sometime. . All of which are more risky. It's not "totally" blind trust. Lastpass plugins are in javascript, so most of the source code can be easily checked. Encryption is done locally on the client machine. Plus it's a really company with physical address so they would be open to millions of dollars lawsuits if they were involved in any shenanigans.
You have good reasons but tho I will not buy it

- my reasons in the previous posts (incl. NXT forum)
PS: a company in a bankruptcy cannot be sued ( just generally speaking, not referring to Lastpass).
That has caused big harms and losts to many during the last 10 years.