It's interesting that you lash out at others for making claims about closed source (for now) code, then turn around and do the exact same thing, just with a different slant.
I can't figure out what you're saying here. Is the idea that I can't say anything at all about something thats closed?
Thats not my position at all. My position is that that a closed source cryptographic currency is inherently centralized (via control of the source), and that experience suggests that most such systems are snake oil (they don't deliver the things they claim to) if not being outright trojans. Indeed, you can't tell maybe it's actually great, but great things usually don't need to hide in the shadows. The safe assumption is that they're not great at all.
Sounds nice... for the few who got on the BTC train early. Sounds like profit motives, incredibly sleazy.
I've never been involved in Bitcoin to make a profit. If I add up the tips and such I've received for hard technical work I've done it would be well below minimum wage. I've been involved a long time since before it was worth much of anything, and seemed like an insane dream that it ever would be because the technology is interesting and important. I've also sold most of my Bitcoins since long ago was never looking to win the lottery. And yes, I feel completely comfortable looking down my nose at people who showed up late rabid with dreams of effortless profit, at least when they go around promoting zero-sum trades to enrich themselves not pointing any particular fingers here... I assume the people I'm talking about know who they are.
Out of curiosity, if they never mentioned your name at all, what would've you demanded then?
I'd do mostly what I did anyways say nothing and see if anything interesting happened. I only piped up recently because of what I perceive to be misinformed heavy handed promotional efforts spilling out into threads where they are off-topic.