Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][BBR] Boolberry [ANONYMOUS | CRYPTONOTE] 2 EXCHANGES
by
oranges411
on 06/06/2014, 13:58:50 UTC
we must improve  Gravity Well
when the hashrate slow down,and the diff down,someone prize the hashrate and diff quickly
when the diff going so high,they leave us,I think there is a bug in it

Well, i see as a main problem now is that we don't have pools. Since we have a different PoW it's not so easy to be add BBR to existing pools.
I'm working now on simple built-in pool, to allow everyone to run his own daemon-based pool withot any development, just plug-and-pool.

But if this won't help - i'll hardfork BBR with new difficulty adjustment.



Can I use daemon-based pool now ?

When I'm mining solo my hashrate is  ~ 560 610 kb/s  each one from four servers.
Total  is ~ 2 Mh/s . With pools ~ 780 860 kb/s from 4 servers. 

When was announced that pools are up i've freezed daemon-based pool branch, and got back to developing GUI.
Hope Lukas  gonna fix bugs.
Mike will announce bounty for simpleminer optimization today, hope we make it multithreaded in the next few days.

Total  is ~ 2 Mh/s . With pools ~ 780 860 kb/s from 4 servers. - did you start simpleminer instance per each core on your servers ?

Simpleminer might need to be optimized more than simply adding a multi-threaded feature.  Ask anyone using it and they will tell you they are getting a little less than half the hash they usually get from solo mining with boolbd.  Even when we run an instance for each core/thread.   No one wants to use simpleminer because of this.   This is why no pools have found blocks yet.

A boolbd miner might solve the hashrate problem, as boolbd mines just fine.  Looking forward to the GUI.