- CryptoNote development started 2 years ago.
- How can CN code be behind Bitcoins? Bitcoins source was always open source. CNs source and development was kept private. CN got ring signatures working, a technology that many experts doubted could ever be brought into a coin, because it was to complex to implement. (Dark has no multi-sig-support, ...)
What do you mean how it can be behind Bitcoin? It can because it was developed later and is far more immature.
- CN project was especially started to improve on the mistakes made during development of Bitcoin.
(Centralized Development, no privacy, ...)
The "centralized development" part is not true if you fork Bitcoin and make an altcoin - as there are hundreds of them. If you want to make a new coin, the centralized development part of another coin is not an issue for your coin anyway.
Privacy is another thing, but Bitcoin is modular and can be extended to do things.
- CN plattform has 4 active coins with devs and growing blockchains and one extern research and expert team for guidance.
How can CN be behind Dark?? Make no sense.
Have you ever used CN coins? Do you want me to find quotes of people fuming about how regressive the CN stuff is for everyday use?
- I really wish the best to Dark and Evan. But you 10000% DarkCoin fanboys, spreading wrong infos (some spread FUD) really gave DRK a bad images in the last days.
No FUD here: Do a research on the BTC cost to add 100 GB bloat in CN blockchains and report back to this thread about how costly would it be to render their blockchains DOA if, say, a malicious attacker was so inclined to do so. Also describe us the consequences in terms of loading wallets after that attack happens.