Re: [Open Letter] Altcoin exchanges have to be public or die. Updated List Inside
Good thread for all the black / white thinking authority lead masses.
There are reasons beyond an intent to scam to remain anonymous in cryptocurrency exchange operations.
Although I agree these are rare, but they do exist.
For me personally these reasons are related to being able to continue producing value for my e-currency customers, like I have done since 1999 believe it or not.
To be able to continue these activities and benefit the society in whole I'm going to keep both my integrity and anonymity intact. Fortunately there are people who judge people by their track record instead of their government issued id.
There are reasons beyond an intent to scam to remain anonymous in cryptocurrency exchange operations.
Although I agree these are rare, but they do exist.
For me personally these reasons are related to being able to continue producing value for my e-currency customers, like I have done since 1999 believe it or not.
To be able to continue these activities and benefit the society in whole I'm going to keep both my integrity and anonymity intact. Fortunately there are people who judge people by their track record instead of their government issued id.
As a legitimate coin dev who wishes to remain anonymous at this stage, I feel the same way.
What was happening in the digital currency scene in 1999?
EDIT: but I think transparency can be important for exchanges, with the amount of funds which can be held. But I actually have some NXT on DGEX and just bought into the IPO for the new finnish coin through it too
