So they should do it, right? Oh, they're waiting to copypasta Evan's work and he's not giving it to them which makes their douchedevery even more obvious...
Dumbasses, shitcoins and douchedevs, oh my!
Being closed source in the new crypto environment is not a bug, it's a feature.
A bad feature.
No it is not a bad feature/ or actually way to go. Can you imagine if a bunch of copycoins implemented an unfinished DarkSend, and all started having forking issues, and their coins are ruined, or worse, it causes people to be able to mint all the coins they want? Not only would the users/buyers of that coin get screwed, they'd end up blaming Darkcoin/Evan for the fiasco, even if Evan were to notify everyone that the source is not completed and has issues.
THAT is why it is
currently closed source and why, when it has passed the mustard, it will be open sourced so EVERYONE can feel good about using these features knowing nothing is hiding in the code. That is obviously the goal.
Right now, Evan is using tools to block of problems in sections so he can solve things one at a time. He is using tools that would never be kept in the final product, but it helps to isolate issues so they can be worked on one at a time.
The whole thing is going very well, we have a lot of great people testing and questioning on testnet, Evan usually knows of the issues found and patiently explains what he is doing. But don't listen to me, I'm just a silly fan girl ;P