I view such claims as more evidence of deception and fraudulent intent.
This to me makes absolutly no sense. Now you say that for two years they had fraudulent intent? For two years they did nothing to attempt to make money off this coin.
I can't comment on what happened for two years since there is no verifiable evidence even supporting the existence of two years of activity.
I'm talking about what has happened since this coin has surfaced. Implausible claims have repeatedly been put forward which suggests intent to deceive. Unless of course those claims, though implausible, turn out to be valid. I'm waiting for verifiable evidence. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. We can start with even ordinary evidence though.