There are, or at least ought not be, any "Holly Relics" of "coindom." I can understand the feeling of those that see Shibe as and attack on there favored coin.  I can respect their feelings, but can they see the dangers of the position they hold?  If decentralized currency is the "goal," can they see the dangers inherent in object dismissal of new coin based solely on the position that the coin is derivative or imposes on a prior coins toes?  We all "stand in the shoulders of the giants that came before us," and to outright reject the next step, the next innovation, regardless how "derivative" creates hierarchies.  In other words, Rejection = the creation of crypto Banks of America, Case Banks, Wells Fargos, etc. and places "centralized" authority in only the "select few" "worthy" coins. I'm certainly not saying that scammers in the name of innovation should run wild and free, but there is danger inherent in the ontological weighing of coins without deeper reflection.