snip.... I am skeptical.... snip
The most conservative aspect of my estimates is the fact that
I used BC as a comparison,
which is
not even an anon coin. (could have used dark you know, even when compensating for the difference in total number (12 to 1) this bumps the 80k figure to well over 300k per year for the service in question)
And here's a free tip...
any coin that is not anon is going to be very seriously disadvantaged when ppl generally realize that non-anon coins (including btc btw) leave a double-wide trail engraved in digital stone.because... At least half the wealth flowing into cc is trying to
escape being tracked somewhere down the road.I want to first thank you for not taking my words as attacking your point of view, and thank you for welcoming me, I've been paying quite a bit of attention to the crypto scene for the past few months, and we need very opinionated people like yourself here.
anon is a good feature, but it is just that, a feature, and in a few months will be a STANDARD feature among coins as an option to how we can spend our cryptocurrency..... snip
What you are saying is true in a field of 500 alt coins, but the anon field is currently about a dozen, with half of those being either weak or felonious in their support. The few
, which is all the edge a coin like OC will need to set new precedents in price gains.