I really need tc8000. With no tc or set to 6016 my hash drops by almost 150 per card. Thanks for trying. Anyone have the bin with tc8000? Thanks!
Here's what I'm using:
Card 0 is 280x, card 1 is 7950
sgminer 4.1.0 - Started: [2014-06-10 16:22:41] - [0 days 00:20:30]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5s):6.125M (avg):6.112Mh/s | A:239 R:1 HW:0 WU:0.103/m
ST: 0 SS: 3 NB: 34 LW: 1646 GF: 0 RF: 0
Connected to uswest.wafflepool.com:3331 (stratum) diff 0.008 as user 1HANJQygp3j
Block: eeb01873... Diff:220 Started: [16:40:01] Best share: 1.905
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[P]ool management [G]PU management ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
GPU 0: 58.0C 2777RPM | 3.166M/3.170Mh/s | A:127 R: 0.0% HW:0 WU:0.050/m I:16
GPU 1: 56.0C 3096RPM | 2.967M/2.964Mh/s | A:113 R: 0.8% HW:0 WU:0.053/m I:18
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[16:42:06] Accepted 3feb9625 Diff 0.016/0.008 GPU 1 at Pool 0
[16:42:09] Accepted 1beb7ced Diff 0.036/0.008 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[16:42:10] Accepted 2a5e9542 Diff 0.024/0.008 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[16:42:15] Accepted 6b7133b2 Diff 0.009/0.008 GPU 1 at Pool 0
[16:42:23] Accepted 104c9aff Diff 0.061/0.008 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[16:42:23] Accepted 737b6687 Diff 0.009/0.008 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[16:42:30] Accepted 44ef95cf Diff 0.015/0.008 GPU 1 at Pool 0
[16:42:33] Accepted 4673ec5a Diff 0.014/0.008 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[16:42:34] Accepted 5e95121c Diff 0.011/0.008 GPU 1 at Pool 0
[16:42:40] Accepted 61404ba1 Diff 0.010/0.008 GPU 1 at Pool 0
[16:42:43] Accepted 3efda005 Diff 0.016/0.008 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[16:42:57] Accepted 76a679d9 Diff 0.008/0.008 GPU 1 at Pool 0
[16:43:09] Accepted 396af744 Diff 0.017/0.008 GPU 0 at Pool 0
{
"pools" : [
{
"url" : "stratum+tcp://uswest.wafflepool.com:3331",
"user" : "1HANJQygp3jHuzutceBgMT7wfCgEug6h4L_R9280x-HD7950",
"pass" : "d=0.008"
},
{
"url" : "stratum+tcp://pool1.us.multipool.us:3371",
"user" : "arthertonjohn.GPU2",
"pass" : "x"
}
]
,
"intensity" : "16,18",
"worksize" : "256,256",
"kernel" : "x11mod",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"thread-concurrency" : "24576,24000",
"shaders" : "2048,1792",
"gpu-threads" : "4,4",
"gpu-engine" : "1050-1080,1065-1100",
"gpu-fan" : "50-100",
"auto-fan" : true,
"gpu-memclock" : "1600,1250",
"gpu-memdiff" : "0",
"gpu-powertune" : "0",
"gpu-vddc" : "0.000",
"temp-cutoff" : "95",
"temp-overheat" : "85",
"temp-target" : "60",
"api-mcast-port" : "4028",
"api-port" : "4028",
"expiry" : "59",
"failover-switch-delay" : "60",
"gpu-dyninterval" : "7",
"gpu-platform" : "0",
"log" : "5",
"no-pool-disable" : true,
"queue" : "0",
"scan-time" : "50",
"tcp-keepalive" : "30",
"temp-hysteresis" : "2",
"shares" : "0",
"kernel-path" : "/usr/local/bin",
"no-client-reconnect" : true,
"no-submit-stale" : true
}
That has nothing to do with what I am asking. It isn't even the same GPU...
Yeah, it's been stated here a couple times that thread count is NOT used in the X11 or X13 algorithms in this miner.
With X13 that is accurate at least with my finding. With X11 it isn't. My 5970 running x11 with no tc set or 6016 it get 1.9mh/s per core. When running the exact same thing except with tc set to 8000 I get 1.98mh/s per core. I have run this test over and over again and I get the same results every time.