I'm the owner of 17JkL94B2ngJg4QQZuiozDQjnxXB6B7yTc and 1Gu8zxRi8cyENV8CQe52D7QEsiZ7ruT73u.
http://eligius.st/~wizkid057/newstats/userstats.php/17JkL94B2ngJg4QQZuiozDQjnxXB6B7yTc
http://eligius.st/~wizkid057/newstats/userstats.php/1Gu8zxRi8cyENV8CQe52D7QEsiZ7ruT73u
You haven't make any payment to me after 5/3.
And your customer ticket service said that I'm scamming. Please explain something with evidence.
http://eligius.st/~wizkid057/newstats/userstats.php/17JkL94B2ngJg4QQZuiozDQjnxXB6B7yTc
http://eligius.st/~wizkid057/newstats/userstats.php/1Gu8zxRi8cyENV8CQe52D7QEsiZ7ruT73u
You haven't make any payment to me after 5/3.
And your customer ticket service said that I'm scamming. Please explain something with evidence.
Did you with withhold blocks either by purpose or mistaken bad code is the simple answer that we want to know ??
Is it possible that he/she could have programmed their miners to submit the valid blocks for their self while continuing to get shares from Eligius?
no
Can I ask why not?
The hash that was valid versus the target would have been of a block header that reflects paying the pool's coinbase tx. Changing the coinbase would hash to something completely random and different.
Cool, got it.
Thanks
