If he is guilty by math, can someone that has access to the data submit a proof? Even if we believe the data to be unmodified, I have yet to see an explanation as to how they know for sure they are guilty and not simply unlucky!
Then there's the other obvious question, why not just block them instead of allowing them to continue to mine and not pay them? But that is a separate issue and I don't want that to distract from the bigger problem of it not being explained how they know the perpetrator wasn't unlucky.
If someone did post the proof, then I apologize, I read every post slowly and was unable to find it. There are lots of discussion of the theory, but nothing like "they submitted X shares, and solved Y, at 1/3 what you would expect to be solved", or "we remined some of his shares, and he had been given solveable ones" , or "on date Z we can prove the pool sent his miners a solveable share and it didn't solve it".
So far this is looking up in the air to me.
I'm just curious, how do you detect it, and know they aren't just unlucky in ever finding a block?
Just curious, how can you be confident this was a hack? I mean what is the probability that they've just had bad luck and never got a winning answer but have genuinely been playing fairly?
Reason I ask is if it was bad luck you're inadvertently screwing over a genuine miner to subsidize others. (Although is surprising someone would leave that much BTC in an online account!)
I'm guessing you're very sure about this but would like to know how you're so sure.
and the luck is really bad now:
Round Luck: 37.4%
We would like some answers please, instead all I see are pitchforks and speculation on how guilty people act psychologically.