Re: [ANN][DRK] DarkCoin | First Anonymous Coin | First X11 | First DGW

Quote from: AlexGR on June 14, 2014, 05:23:55 AM

Quote from: Coinasaur on June 14, 2014, 04:29:33 AM

Well so everyone is saying that blocks of gigantic proportions can be created by the Dev and instamined and that a hidden "Superblock" has already been discovered once.
What is to stop them from doing this again? I got called a FUDDER for it, but seriously. I have read this from many different sources. Does anyone have an OFFICIAL response to this?

http://wiki.darkcoin.eu/wiki/FAQ#I_read_somone_who_wrote_that_there_is_a_hidden_premine_in_block_4137._Is_that_true.3F

Hint: Learn to read block explorers by yourself so that you do not confuse block generation with transactions.

LOL, he claims it's 50% instamined. Little does he know we are all just one entity and it is 100% instamined and the rest were IPOd.

Apparently we have a cloakshit reseller here picking up a fight in order to see if there will be reverse fud in their thread and they get a raise out of it just like XC

Quote from: Coinasaur on June 11, 2014, 10:56:29 PM

Quote from: Givatoshi_Moremoto on June 11, 2014, 10:29:33 PM

I think one of the reason why mintpal or poloniex are not adding cloak on their exchange is because of the exchange anon function. This has never been done before and to their perspective, it is a big unknown. Maybe the devs are talking to them and explaining how the anon exchange function works, maybe they're waiting for this function to be tested and proven. who knows whats going on behind the scene?

I don't expect any big exchange to add cloak until the anon exchange function has been successfully implemented and tested.

They added dark and xc, both of those claim first anon coin but are yet to produce working anon function. Cloak actually could become the first truly working anon coin which is a HUGE thing. Testing starts very soon (today and tomorrow)

How do these FUDge packers operate. It is like clockwork cycle of neverending stupidity.