8. However this is obviously false, because:
- there's no record in the blockchain linking Wallet B's transaction with Wallet C's transaction fee.
- there's no record in the blockchain that a single address received the money that Wallets B and C spent.
Therefore Chaeplin did not establish proof of a link between Wallets B and C.
So, if outputs of two tx are spent in a single tx, B and C is belong to single entity.
And I provided it.
Thanks for the reply Chaeplin. I have studied the blockchain and read your post several times and I still cannot see that you provided a direct link. [EDIT: You asked me to check indices 14 and 18. They are from the same address, wallet B. This does not prove that wallet B and C are owned by the same entity.]
In which transaction were Wallets B and C used as inputs?
Which address is the output of this transaction?
Please do not only paste code. You need to also establish what the code implies, using normal English.
Alternatively, write in your first language and we will try to find someone to translate it for us.