Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: Why Poloniex Has Rejected SuperCoin
by
Spoetnik
on 14/06/2014, 21:59:16 UTC
You guys realize that before the recent fork of SUPER, it was supposed to be 150million total coin supply?

They might have forgot to change this number down to 50 million that it should be now.

Poloniex should not have jumped the gun with this when PoW ends in 73 days from now and PoW checks out clean according to CryptoCobain.

This was cloned from Honorcoin. It even used Honorcoin's stake checkpoint.

So now you're changing your reasoning, and saying it won't be added because it's a clone of some other coin? Most of coins are clones of other coins, just with features added. All scryptcoins are clones of litecoin. This is damage control that you are doing right now. Please stop spreading more FUD, admit your mistakes, and delete this thread.

Did I say I'm not listing it because it was cloned?

jakiman said that the value may have been leftover from the old SUPER coin. I am saying that is not very likely, because this coin was cloned from Honorcoin, not the old SUPER coin. See bitcoinrpc.cpp of Honorcoin and (new) SuperCoin side by side: http://www.diffchecker.com/j8xl540o

I'd say that is a smoking gun.. Super coin is looking seriously scammy.
I tried to get the Honorcoin Source code right now from Github but it's long gone..

Guys don't be greedy fools.. it looks like this guy was caught red handed setting you up for a scam big time and your all making dumb excuses for the scammer.
i guess you invested in a scam coin and ow your going to defend it the bitter scammy end eh ? lol
wow i'm soooo surprised  Roll Eyes

So far i used Beyond Compare to do some check and i also loaded up Visual studio and created a blank project
then i took the search string "AmountFromValue" which is the function name of the suspicious spot of code..
then i used search to find all calls to that function.. still looking Wink