@. thanks netizen!
For any anarchist who faults the state on its use of force, the only fair response is to out-compete it fair and square. If anarchism is truly better, bitcoin will probably be an important milestone in the path to getting there. Work hard on it! Help make it succeed! But remember that bitcoin is about all of us, not just about those who believe that. Don't worry though, I still love you even if I think the world isn't ready for anarchism yet
I think you are confused about something. A government, by definition, does not 'compete fair and square.' Just to use an extreme example, Kim Jong Il does not let the people of North Korea try out new ideas. He throws them into a labor camp for an indeterminate amount of time for dissenting. This is an extreme example, but there are many other less extreme examples which are analogous. I cannot open a private post office in the U.S. that delivers first class mail as a less extreme example.
I wasn't calling the government to compete fair and square, although I do in other arenas of life demand a higher standard from it than what I typically see. I was speaking specifically to anarchists who fault the state on its use of force.
A government is an entity that externalizes costs. What this means is that the government consists of individuals allocating, diverting and regulating resources that are not their own. They do this through the popular belief that their political processes grant them the de jure right to do so. It is this belief that I vehemently challenge. No political process can grant anyone the right to touch resources they didn't receive on a voluntary basis. People in the government may or may not be trying to do 'good things', but they are doing it with other people's resources. I don't care what they invent, or what your or they think they are doing. The grabbed other people's stuff under duress.
To sum all of this up, my desire is to destroy any entity that externalizes costs. This includes, gangs, thieves, mafias and governments. For me there is no 'government lite'. Smash it all to bits NOW is my modus operandi.
That may be your desire, but if you act on it you do end up rather hypocritical--faulting the state on its use of force yet considering it fine to use force for your own agendas. It's kind of a "don't sink to their level" issue, dontcha think? If anything, I would think a political process has
more legitimacy behind it than an individual's desire does, though I personally think the way forward is to give people more freedom as to which jurisdiction they want to live under. Speaking of which--Somalia is pretty anarchist these days. Just saying. The option is there.