I don't see why we shouldn't trust busoni's claim when it's true, explain why was it higher value than the other one then?
Because it has jack shit to do with the max coin supply, it is so irrelevant they didnt bother changing it.
hey smart guy.. what if i made
OTHER changes to the code on the next update increasing the money supply ?
the function that is called that contain that max money static variable is used in a lots of places and what would happen first
is if someone tried to send money that is greater than that setting the transaction would fail to go through.
so it would be a NECESSITY to setup a scam !
most of you here prob have no experience coding in 'c' or even looked at the code but are spouting off.
the fact is this could have been a multi-part scam.. as in parts of malicious code are added in phases so not to set off an alarm.
this Altcoin scene is swiss cheese with scammers running wild 24/7.. hell look what god damn coin it was based on
Honor coin of all coins LOLOLOL
I have witnessed coin cloners here update the wallets with scammer code.. i don't want to get into who and what coin etc but trust me i know for a FACT it happens.
You guys need to cut the crap.. most of you know nothing but are repeating 'crap' you *heard.
And the bottom line is do we have proof 100% that something malicious was going on ?
Maybe ? Maybe not.
But it does LOOK fishy.
And if something looks fishy in crypto.. it usually is.
Most of you are gullible and eat up what ever is fed to you and this is just shell account games for control of the lemmings.. the usual Bitcointalk routine.
got a brain ? use it.. or don't not my problem.