I have been following this thread. I think that the issue that Chaeplin is trying to tell you about is that XC id dependent on trusting the XNODE operator. Because the XNODE is, in effect, scrubbing the link between sender and receiver, the XNODE has access to the senders private key, and therefore, can steal the coins.
This is a huge problem, and why people keep inquiring whether the anon is trusted (how XNODEs work) or trustless.
Yes i agree, but isn't this point nulled now? i mean atcsecure has altered this so that it does not even work like that any longer? he is implementing something more similar to drks way of doing things?
I mean that's how i understand things. This 1.5 V is this still vulnerable to the same issues or not?
Will not the finished version of xc have a trustless method anyway?
I think though people are a little too hostile to this guy, seems a smart guy who pointed out xc needed some changes..... it's getting changed so no real problem.
The guy is probably invested deep in drk, so motivation for this is clear..... never the less he is actually helping or has helped xc so no need to call the guy names i guess.
If he states only the truth with evidence i see no problem.