They all can't be bad. AMT gave their customer that I am working with two good boards which are in the system we are running online. I suggested to AMT that they can pay their bill, sort through the delivered PCBs for what is still working, and I can show them what we have done. They are not interested. PCBs that are broken can also be repaired with some troubleshooting; however, that is something that AMT expected IMET to do for free. This is out of our scope of work and may not be cost effective. Engineering time would need to be expended to make that decision.
So let me get this straight. You had offered to AMT to fix any non-working PCBs, yet they aren't interested?
Are they supposed to fix any non-working units delivered to the customer? How are they supposed to do this?
Talk about breach of fiduciary duty.
We would have looked into fixing boards if AMT was willing to pay for this work. The problems occurred are not due to PCB assembly. Because the problems are not due to PCB assembly, this work is out of scope for IMET and we would need to be compensated.