Dedicatedpool does not agree with rolling back. Bittrex should not be forced to lose BTC on this matter. Dedicatedpool has stayed on the old wallet, and Bittrex will as well.
This was not Bittrex's fault. Shit happens unfortunately, but you can't except them to take the hit on this.
If Bittrex stays on the old wallet, how are you guys going to sell your NJA?
If i have roll back the chain it's because there was a very small error but with huge problems on PoS. It's not that it was not working but it worked too well.
Millions or billions of coins were created in no time with staking. It's just not possible to stay on the old wallet.
The rollback was very short, maybe 3 hours ago to get in a sane blockchain with correct staking reward.
For a 3 hours problem, i think it's better to roll back a little. No other choice.
I would totally agree with you John if people hadn't sold their obviously fawlty coins to bittrex it would have been an easy fix to just roll it back, everyones wallets would have been corrected and problem solved without anyone getting hurt. but because some (seems to be quite a few) knowingly sold their coins on bittrex there is now a shwack load of people who spent real btc's for those coins and it's their wallets that will be hurt if it's done now.
besides price this is the other reason it's retarded to push a coin on bittrex before it's been checked/tested... if we had waited till after pow had ended to list on bittrex then we wouldn't be in this mess and the people that wanted to knowingly sell their bad coins wouldn't have had the help of the exchange, we would have been able to fix the issue and have everything top notch before it hit the markets... so there would have been no fud to work through and no people out money cause of a lack of testing.
EDIT: do we know appox how many bad coins were sold in the market?