Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: [422 GH/s] EMC: 0 Fee/DGM/Merged Mining/PayPal Payout/SMS/Yubikey/More
by
iNs4nePT
on 07/02/2012, 06:18:42 UTC
No, there's not really any way to do that, as it would wreck past accounting.  It's actually a fundamental design issue (perhaps you could call it a flaw) suffered by most pools that use the worker paradigm.  I could possibly hide them permanently, but then you couldn't recreate a worker with that same name.

Just a thought, but maybe they could be marked as hidden and then renamed to something like hash(rand()) ?