Because in the described scenario, mining at "home" would be unprofitable anyway.
That is the whole idea behind deploying together to save costs....
It depends on where your home is. Over the next few months, I expect we'll see people in Europe (who often have electricity costs above $0.20/kWh and high VAT) switch to datacenters built from the ground up for hosting bitcoin miners (like the one I'm building, which should charge less than $90/kW/mo or $0.125/kWh). However, if you already live in a place with cheap electricity (like West Virginia, $0.06/kWh), and if you don't have to rent a place just for your miners, then running at home could be a bit more economical as long as you don't place a high price on having a quiet and cool home. You can't get that many machines into your own home, though, so the bulk of the network hashrate (and the eventual hashrate equilibrium, I expect) will be running at around $0.125/kWh.
Immersion cooling will, unfortunately, have high capital costs. I would be surprised if they can get the capital costs down to a level where it can compete with air cooling for commodity hardware, especially if you have good datacenter design and a cool climate.