Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Governments and Bitcoin
by
eMansipater
on 28/03/2011, 01:21:30 UTC
Don't use bitcoin to trade in illegal arms, fund terrorism, and advertise tax evasion, and we'll all do just fine.
To me this translates to:

Don't trade is arms unless they conform to a violently imposed criteria.
Don't fund violence for the purpose of advancing a political ideology.
Don't advertise avoiding funding violence for the purpose of advancing a political ideology.
And we won't have the violence we've funded used against us.
To each their own language--that's the beauty of a diverse society.  But I'm content to raise my kids with those three things as ironclad rules, and I don't consider myself a monster for doing so.
... I think you forget paedophilia and drugs.
You're right, we can include those two as well.  Guess I'm just not a very imaginative lawbreaker--I was thinking more about the "being labelled domestic terrorists" angle.  And again, two things I'm going to advise anyone I care about to stay the hell away from.

Is it really a violent conspiracy against all that is good and holy for an individual who is a BitCoin advocate to propose people steer clear of gun-running, terrorism-funding, paedophilia, drugs, and tax evasion as a simple way to help bitcoin succeed?  It's not a philosophical treatise, it's just an opportunity--seizing it can't be too much to ask from such a highly intelligent community.  If it were, I would think I'd seriously misunderstood the potential scope of BitCoin technology.

At the end of the day, people need to realise there's a pretty big difference between keyboard philosophy and real-world change.  If there's anyone here who aspires to Waco, they need to be slapped upside the head.  And if there's a single reply here about either the specifics of that situation or the completely flawed government response, you have missed the whole point.  Even from a "Davidian Branch Davidian" standpoint, the people in that scenario were fundamentally lacking the ability for civil interaction with the world at large; had they possessed it they would still be alive.  Anyone who thinks different has never seen a man die.

To take this back out of the esoteric, what I'm saying is people can and should believe whatever their conviction tells them.  But real-world actions have consequences.  So is BitCoin going to be a philosophical exercise, or a real-world technology?  It's up to us.