Loving the counter-arguement. Speaks volumes.
It was exactly what your arguments were worth. Would you've been happier if I responded with a slur of zero-substance buzz words?
Zero substance buzzwords? These arn't buzzwords, they are substantiated facts. I'm sorry you don't understand what is the basis for an argument here.
The fact is, DRK offers a poorly designed option for a centralised anonymous currency, while XC in a matter of days will be considerably more anonymous and much more secure, and it will lay the foundations for a decentralised platform. What took DRK nearly six months to achieve has been significantly bettered in less than two. We're now in a situation where we are comparing a semi centralised coinjoin clone to a decentralised P2P anonymous platform.
The only thing DRK has got going for it was its initial media attention as a first mover, if it started now as brand new coin its technology would be laughed out of the room as another shity P&D.
You can keep deviating from the arguement but please, tell me where I'm wrong.