I would like to see a huge pile of NEM get into the hands of average joe without them paying for it,this will make the stakeholders mad since they had to pay for it but average joes won't be spending money to buy NEM when they are not sure about it. Isn't the goal of NEM to help people achieve financial freedom? The more people that have it the greater chance NEM will succeed which will increase the value for the stakeholders.
This is not how real life works. Aurora tried to get adapted as a country coin by distributing them freely, but Icelanders immediately dumped the coins for BTC instead -- crashing the prices immediately.
Where is the adaption? Nowhere. Anything that is "freely" distributed to a large number of people will have no value -- as anything that is "free" is worthless.
As for destroying them, I am happy with that idea, but in reality it's same as distributing them equally to all stakeholders. The net effect is the same.
I just don't want "developers" or the "insiders" to be sitting on 50% of the coins ("locked" or not as why should we trust what they will do next year or year after that?) Why on earth even leave that an option?
As far as I am concerned they are already controlling way too many coins with 25% -- add unclaimed coins to that list and whole thing starts to turn into joke
There was no proof in how many people received Aurora, it sounded like the dev kept a large amount of them. I said:
[/quote]
I was thinking that when NEM does presentations, hand out paper wallets to
people that seem interested and have never used crypto before, samething for our co-workers, friends, neighbors or whoever (even the poor and the under-privileged).
[/quote]
don't just hand them to whomever.
And you don't think people on here with NEMstakes won't be dumping them for BTC?
"anything free is worthless" really? so the time people put in volunteering is worthless?