Re: NEM Official Moderated Thread [Updates & Discussion][Civilized Discussion]
Yep, BC next writes the code, and decides not to put in 1 + (5%) bitcoin in his creation, after making a claim that he would eat his hat if the coins wasn;t worth alot of money within 6 months 
how do we know that he doesn;t own 30 % +?
we don't
this is at least transparent
how do we know that he doesn;t own 30 % +?
we don't
this is at least transparent
How do you know Utopian doesn't own 1500 of 2800 stakes? Arguments without evidence are not arguments. There is no evidence that BCNext put 1 BTC, but even if he did,so what? Everyone was free to put 1 BTC. There were no special rules for the developer. Everyone was free to use sock puppets (if there are any). Everything was distributed equally to stakeholders who put BTC, with zero development stake, and IPO was open for 2 months. Everything was transparent as anyone can check original thread, and the nxt blockchain and the blochchain.info hashes to confirm everything.
some arguments don;t need evidence, if its logically so damn obvious
utopian owned 60 stakes i believe?? i think i read it somewhere
I never heard that UP had as many as 60 stakes. I DID hear that almost all of his stakes are now gone after the taint analysis.