OK, you wanna play then let's play....
Clearly you two are not on the same page, name calling doesn't help anyone.
He is asking (among other things) if you think it is a problem because you haven't been clear on that. For example...
Danny I have much respect for you man, and I do believe you have a lot of knowledge but I don't think you got my point.
I (as in me personally) am not worried about a 51% attack right now.
I am worried about what this is doing to BTC (mostly caused by media FUD).
The FUD that has been going around is damaging BTC rep and it's slowing down adoption as people tend to see the bad side of things instead of the benefits.
So you are not worried about a 51% attack, but are worried about media FUD about a 51% attack. What is the bigger problem, the risk of a 51% attack or the FUD about a 51% attack? If the FUD is the problem, could education be the answer?
I don't think it's fair to claim nothing has been done to eliminate the risk of a 51% attack. As far as I know, there is no known way to solve this problem without a central authority, all pow/pos coins are affected. Does this mean the problem is being ignored? I wouldn't think so, I am sure there is at least one person out there working on a different method for consensus.
Minor edits for clarityYou are absolutely right.
So there's no point of arguing.
Maybe I don't understand what Danny is saying or maybe he doesn't understand what I am saying.
So no point for this to go on.
Danny I apologize man.
Maybe I don't understand what you are saying.
I have edited my posts.