What about bittrex exchange ?
they are thinking about it still
<@bittrex-richie> Allcryptocoins: yeah we get a lot of that feedback.. like i said.. its super polarizing...
<@bittrex-richie> we either are a) pool operator bitches and part of the mafia or b) destroying crypto by setting a bad precendent.
so they do understand that it would look bad if they don't add MIN. I have no idea what is the precendent he's talking about tho..
The precedent would be that if there is something new in a coin that is part of innovation or taking crypto forward, even if it is an experiment, and a certain part of the community don't like it, and they veto the coin, then it would pave the way for selective crypto coins in future that suits only certain parts of the community. Lets say in future a new coin is launched with some method that makes pool operators redundant, then and they bitch about it, then the precedent would be there to exclude the coin from exchanges.
No, the correct way is to stick with ethics and maintain integrity and give each coin with its characteristics an equal chance on the exchanges, even if it pisses off a certain part of the community. That piece of innovation might now be unpopular, but might just be the thing taking crypto forward a few steps and build the body of knowledge.