Quote from: Artoodeetoo on June 20, 2014, 07:22:23 PM

Quote from: Mwalshe89 on June 20, 2014, 07:09:35 PM

Quote from: anonymousxx1503 on June 20, 2014, 07:03:58 PM

Quote from: Mwalshe89 on June 20, 2014, 07:00:12 PM

Quote from: sukottosan_d on June 20, 2014, 06:52:13 PM

Quote from: Artoodeetoo on June 20, 2014, 06:43:21 PM

Maybe its a case of reaping what DRK Fudders have sown, the massive FUD attacks on XC... And look who is laughing now

XC - XNODES working, Anonymous technology (multipath implemented) - yes it worked - no fork - Oh and a top tier pro dev who knows what he is doing.

DRK - well we can see where DRK is... Fork anyone?
Better call the Karma Police?

You miss the point that xnodes are useless, even when working.

Please elaborate. XCNodes are currently a much better system, and most importantly, they work.
Owwww. And they're not closed source. Imagine all the problems darksend probably has if Evan can't even fix this?

You understand the part where Xnodes are actually not doing much of anything right? The part where Masternodes add something actually unique and their purpose is not just anonimity but proof of service?

You know XNodes run from inside the wallet right? There is no need to separate the two. So the issue above you think you've solved isn't actually an issue at all, just one DRK has created

Judging by the fact XC is up 10% since DRK forked looks like a few of the fanclub are realising... XC is a superior coin with a much superior dev.

VRC already has working anon and will be releasing a ring based decentralized and trustless anon in the upcoming version. All without the block chain bloat that affects the cryptonote based coins.