Thats a nice load of garbage.
What's garbage? This analysis?
Why are you so bent on fudding? Whats your motive? And dont tell me its out of the kind of your heart caring for our investments. If you really cared about our investments, you'd stop trying to drive the price down, not that its working.
I don't care about your investments. It is none of my business. I'm just interested in seeing a concept that could offer true anonymity (even if only in theory) when fully developed. That's all. The hype around CryptCoin looked very promising and so a landed in this thread.
If that's the case then sit back and wait, why waste your time fudding?
Because I think that much better anonymity solutions can be developed if the whole development process is completely open and transparent and it is led by non anonymous and non shady developers that have name, credentials, references in the field of security etc.
So, What do you know about the current ANON implementation that Mindfox is working on ? to say there are better anon solutions (although there may) ?
I know only what is described in whitepaper. I'm afraid that the method described in whitepaper can't bring any anonymity, even if it is implemented perfectly (but it probably won't be implemented perfectly anyway because the process is not open and transparent).
I didn't say that there are better anonymity solutions. Where did I write that?