You claimed you had your ASIC device. You claimed you had a shipping label and tracking number for the device
Both of which were true.
but declined to show either of them.
I showed the device. I didn't show the tracking number for reasons I stated.
Somehow you manage to reconcile those two statements with BFL not shipping the device (thus no tracking number or label) and you not having the device (because it was still at BFL).
Don't forget the context of the tracking number/label bit. I was responding to pedantry with pedantry.
BFL was paying you at the time to develop the mining software.
Are you claiming I said that too, or are you just stating random rumours from people who wouldn't know as if they are truth?
BFL stood to gain 1000 BTC (now worth roughly $600,000) if they could claim the device had shipped by April 1st.
I don't know anything about that.
But to use present-day valuation for something that occurred in the past is ridiculous.
That is why you have no credibility on the subject of BFL. It has already been demonstrated that you are willing to deceive if the stakes are high enough.
What stakes? I gained absolutely nothing from your so-called "deception" (where I stated only the truth).
Edit: Also, I'm curious what stakes you think there are in this thread? I don't see any stakes for anyone...