I really wish you could come to the irc. Isn't there any way you can login to freenode and visit #cryptcoin?
Will try again. The error message that I'm getting is confusing but I think that there may be a problem with banned IPs (I'm using tor to access the internet).
So youre claiming all the security anon stuff is BS yet you cant even get on IRC? Sums it up right there.
I'm not claiming that all the security anon stuff is BS. Where did you get this? You probably didn't understand my posts. I'm actively looking for a solution that will have any chance of providing "true" anonymity.
And honestly - I won't change my internet access method (tor) just because one server is blocking tor exit nodes.
so it seems that you are actually loooking to copy.. or steal someone elses 'true' anon or ideas so you can make your own coin... if not why are you so eager to ask for dev to show you how it work ? you can't wait until it's done and release and see ? LOL
Where did you get the idea that I'm going to make my own coin? I'm not going to make my own coin. I think that there too many coins already. Especially coins with features that can be built on top of bitcoin blockchain already. We don't need special coin for each special feature.
I think that anonymity features need to be developed in open and transparent way if they want to have any chance to provide any anonymity at all.
And how would you know if it were when you just stated you were not a dev? SO are you or are you not?
How would I know what? I'm not a dev (at least not "cryptocoin" dev). I don't understand why is my "dev status" important at all.
YOu want them to provide you information on anon but you have no dev/coding experience. Thats my point. Why else would you want all of these technical clarifications? I mean it almost seems like your fishing for info either a) to provide fud to try to discredit a work in progress or b) steal the ideas. Very fishy my friend.
Where did I say that I have no dev/coding experience? I was just saying that I'm not "cryptocoin" dev. Maybe I didn't make this clear enough, sorry.
And for providing security audits you don't have to be dev/coder. You can be mathematician/cryptologist for example. Most security methods (schemes, algorithms etc.) are actually developed by mathematicians. The devs just code/implement them because they usually don't have enough mathematical knowledge or insight to actually develop them.