I have to comment: It is in all of our best interests that all 3 projects are very successful. The evolution of the blockchain concept and its potential for the betterment of people around the globe is the key issue.
The competition between one and another is in my opinion irrelevant at this very early stage of cryptocurrency adaptation. In fact in an ideal world, leaders of each community should look to cooperate and not compete.
Obviously we all want to make money (note my frustration on XCP the token and how it is sold short in comparison to the great CP concept as a whole) BUT we all will if adaptation and penetration grow exponentially and this will be slower if we rip each other off etc etc.
just a comment.
As you can see from the post just above this, there is a reason for a comparison style chart and really the effort should go beyond that into more detailed comparisons of each project, including usability.
Competition is a sign of a market maturing and I personally can't wait for a little more of it. Competition has moved the 2.0 space forward dramatically already and it will continue to do so in the future. It's important that people have a number of platforms to choose from so that they can work through their decision making process and choose whatever solution is best for their needs.
