Should I submit a whitepaper about my block-chain-reducer, auto-dust-killer, Collect-or-return spends, Tagged receipt spends, network wide-distribution, anti-dominance flooded-deviation-killer and anti-stale vacancy-block-killer?

I like gold more... It'll be a goldpaper, to match the logo. Gold is the new white. White is so yesterday.

Sell you an early peak for 2-BTC. Sell you exclusive "first release rights", for 50-BTC. Otherwise I will just be vague, let everyone screw-up the concepts, again. xD

Potential securities and gains:
 - Historic through-put privacy (Not anonymity. Pure eradication of distribution-paths.)
 - Smaller block-chain size (Size reductions beyond 99% potentially, without loss of holdings or funky compression.)
 - Faster block-chain downloads (Due to smaller size, and an additional method of structure.)
 - Faster block-chain exploring and balance-checking. (Again, due to the major redundant reductions.)
 - Reduced block-sizes from the dust-killer. (Allows for more tx's to be delivered in less space.)
 - Less over-mined blocks, within a time-frame, which leads to abnormal and undesired forking and ultra-low diff-adjustments that hurt the network.
 - Less stale-blocks, ensuring that tx's are never stalled due to an unrealistic and unjustified ultra-high diff-adjustment that hurt the network.
 - Less branching and unfair rejections from slow and distant isolation of network participants.
 - Fast-block coins, without the headaches normally associated with fast-blocks, and all the advantages of fast-blocks. (Shorter delivery, and less potential invalid transactions or double-spends.)
 - Spends that MUST be collected, or they get returned to the sender. (Spender security)
 - Proof-of-purchase, with a "must accept or return" and "return to sender", tag. (For buyers and sellers)

No, I would not expect ANY of that to be implemented by the time of the new wallets release. That is just some of the results/concepts that have been the focus of my studies for the last few years. I commend those who tried to implement some of them, but the solutions they use are lacking in creativity and full of unneeded complications. Some are new, some are old, all are desired and needed for mainstream production.