That is kind of weird that another coin mentions BlueChip being anonymous. But how does this prove it's a scam? Why would you assume this other coin knows anything about BlueChip? I mean anyone can post anything. Do have any more evidence? I don't get it. Can you please explain clearly why you think it's a scam?
Out of all the coins displaying prominent anon capability, how likely is it that a dev would point to BlueChips as being in that race? Especially since very little people know what BlueChips even is. The liklihood is favors that they want to push people from one scam to another (MACD or whatever it is is a demonstrated scam as the dev has dumped already) more than BlueChips having anything even close to resembling Anon, which it hasn't even stated it has. So where did he get that specific reference?
The fact that the poster above me demonstrated that the BlueChips account posted in the MACD thread chastizing people for wanting a Windows wallet, as follows -
cheeese, compile your own wallet, it is a 0 % premined coin - dev have done more then enough, and even spent money out his own pocket.
Be glad he even compiled a mac-wallet, he could have left only the source-code on github.
...should make that red flag nice and bright. The dev of a coin (BCH) that has demonstrated nothing is saying that an incomplete launch is "more than enough effort" from a development standpoint. How much development do you expect from that kind of dev?
Dude...it's a scam.