This has been covered extensively, but I'll cover this once more:

1. first of all we are still busy with the conversion of SAT->SAT² - by the sound of it you probably don't have a good understanding of how much time something like this takes.

2. Secondly, it is in general not possible to provide a detailed roadmap without specifying in some detail what we're working on. Look at basically any innovative company. Do you think that whenever they have an innovative idea, they will announce it before they can actually bring it to the market? Of course not. Why? Because it would allow any of their competitors to run off with the idea. They will first make sure that they are in the position where they can be the first to introduce it in the market. This is no different for coin development. It would not make any sense to give competitors a headstart.


Right. So, apparently you are under the impression that we just spent a lot of time writing the codebase (if you think this is not a lot of work, I'd suggest you go ahead and try it out yourself), and handling the transition (which is also a lot of work in terms of managing everything), only to let things bleed out? That wouldn't make any sense whatsoever. What exactly would be the point of the fact that we have spent all this time and effort if we did not have future plans?


Perhaps this would make sense if first the price would have been driven up and we'd now be in the position where we're trying to convince people to keep buying in at a much higher price. But the exact opposite is true. So what "pumping" are you referring to? You're not making a lot of sense here.

Anyway, if you don't want to support us, that's fine. Nobody is making you. But honestly, the fact that you are spending time on writing such posts isn't exactly productive. If there would be any valid reason to believe that we artificially inflated the price, then perhaps there would be reason for doubt, but that's not quite the case here.