Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][DRK] DarkCoin | First Anonymous Coin | First X11 | First DGW | Fork for Masternode Payment
by
camosoul
on 02/07/2014, 04:19:35 UTC
We need less nicey-nice and more pimp hand...

It's not at all about the price. It's about progress. Bad Actors are stonewalling development. Price is just a proxy of that. I want the value up, yeah. I hold a shitload of DRK. But that's secondary to making it function as promised for so many months now.

Bitch slap these turd burglars. They've had way more than enough notice. Nope. I don't have a masternode. I just want to see progress. It's never, ever, ever a good idea to let the bad guys decide your progress because you'll end up with none.

You don't just give the bad guy whatever he wants, you shoot the fucker in the face.
While I appreciate your colorful use of imagery...the "pimp hand' approach would take a similar amount of time to implement as would the actual fix.

To put it another way, it doesn't make sense to run to the bedroom for a handgun when the appropriate tool for the job is the shotgun by the front door.
But isn't enforcement already there? You make my point for me... If enforcement is already in RC3, why is it no being switched on?

Am I to infer that a different method of vote amalgamation is being implemented that fundamentally changes the protocol, thus pushing them out by new default operation instead of deliberate pimp hand? Rendering the RC3 enforcement obsolete, thus not bothering to use it? RC4 will do it by virtue of new magic stuff?

Essentially, "Blocks are being done a new way in RC4, you better damn well update." And MN payments are just part of that, so why pimp hand when you can have a mo betta excuse for forcing an update that looks less mean to people who care about sugar-coated bullshit, but really does the same damn thing?

    Mal: If anyone gets nosy, you know, just…shoot 'em.
    Zoe: Shoot 'em?
    Mal: Politely.