the same dev of supercoin.. the same tecnology... Will rise Mammothcoin or Supercoin? Surely, no both. Conflict of interest, you know what I mean? This is "real", this is reality not what you think about my account
Does it bother you that Bryce Weiner has been involved with the development of multiple coins?
Really not, because I ve never been involved in any coin made by weiner... but look at now: dev developed supercoin and then there was lack of updates here in mammoth.. now he is focused in mammoth, so in supercoin he doesn't give a roadmap.. he is less active... this is conflict of interest, really unfair. He gains here and there.. investors, not. So, my friend, I don't see a future with this way to live the crypto world. Ask to my friend youngmike: days and days he did the troll in supercoin community... till when he opened my eyes... and I had my vision.. All became clear... So I am here now, like a new man.
With a vision.
With a plan.
With a project.
I need the truth
You think you have clear vision but you're blinded by a cloud of nonsense.
Here's why...
1. The fact that it bothers you that a developer would make money off of two coins is as absurd as telling an investor they can't hold more than one coin in their portfolio.
2. It would be ridiculous to tell a business person that he can only start one business, and even more ridiculous to tell a freelancer he can only work for one client.
With that said, it would be nice if the developers clarified whether your claim is true or false, but I honestly don't care either way. The developers of Super Coin & Mammoth Coin are quite literally a beacon of light in the altcoin scene.
This industry is full of scammers and douches, so even if they are the same person (or group of people) it doesn't really bother me. It shouldn't bother you and it really shouldn't bother anyone.
Neither of these coins can be faulted for doing anything inappropriate so far, so why should this matter?