Yes Kolin, save Quark. I mean, Quark will most likely "survive" but I guess even to you it is not appealing to hold 247 millions of Quark and noone else wants to exchange it with you. As you may have noticed many people sold their Quarks and if you are going to laugh away problems that everyone else in the active community agrees exist then I can see more people turning their back on Quark. The hashrate issue is directly connected to price and trust in Quark, so yeah, we should and will do something about it.
i can answer all that , no problem.
I'm pretty certain I know who sold and it wasn't that many people, because most of group "non tech' did take Bills advice and didn't throw the house in.
as soon as a name that "group Tech" recognized was involved "Max K" they held and new BTC holders from the alt community came in.
they then sold out - and some of the original sub 200 sat "traders" sold , and here we are, hash is nominal and i'd like it higher , but mostly i'd like to try this solution we are hashing out for other reasons.
but we will develop as we go.