Lol, the lower the share price, the higher the "yearly yield."
@Aireun: Not a single Havelock offering is trading above the issue price, not even when you add all the dividends paid to date

Choosing wisely=choosing not to invest.
Prices updated to 6/30/2014. Chart in the first post left unedited for ref.
In the span of five days, prices fell on all but 2 offerings.
One delisting(KCIM).
One failed IPO (PROV).
Two (MS and SMG) remained ~unchanged.
If you see any errors, please PM/post. Thanks.
~Happy investing
All the goodness of Why Do You Invest?, now in a convenient table format.
This bespoke quality table was laboriously handcrafted by earnest local artisans, using only the finest traditional forum markup to bring you authentic, naturally aged vintage data (circa 6/25/2014 6/30/2014).
If you spot any errors, please PM. Feel free to post HERE if you crave a intilectual discussing.
* Multiple numbers in this column correspond to multiple IPO trenches--first tranche, second tranche etc., etc.
** "Dividends paid" is the sum total of all dividends paid to date (6/25/2014 6/30/2014).
*** "Profit" is calculated using this formula: ((highest bid)+(Dividends paid)-(Issue price)) / (Issue price) * 100.
This number represents not calculated due to laziness and the inevitable bickering that's sure to ensue about the meaning of "profit."
Suffice it to say none of the securities listed could be called profitable with a straight face. One, thanks for the PM.
[1] In the case of ASICMINER, issue price represents the price at the time of initial listing on Havelock, not the IPO price.
[2] This [three-part offering] is not an investment but a ((zero sum)-fee) game. The issuer is open and honest about this.Edit: corrected ROCKMINER