Just shortly because I lack time (traveling this weekend, weehee)
@cryptohunter
Okay, the companion coin. Let's discuss the best way to bring this in. Premined and ipo sold only for qrk only.
I didn´t think of IPO or sold for Quark only. Imho that´s not necessary. If the coin is premined it shouldn´t be given out just like that but dedicated to specific activities. This is the only valid and acceptable way to do premine. It would finally be a reward not only for keeping the network up but also for keeping the community developing. Both are important and I don´t see that even one coin did this kind of "premine".
With regard to the superblocks, please comment on the idea I am going to write down below.
@orm
Ah, damn, yeah, forgot it is you
@1 I mentioned Bittrex because it will be easy to get there and many traders use it. No matter where the coin is: people will dump. I see that happen on every exchange. We should be agnostic here. Would people invest? I don´t see why they won´t if both are distinguishable and if it is not necessary forver.
Also, we could integrate the superblock idea with the companion coin: The coin could run for 3 years and then the "experimental coins" are integrated in the Quark blockchain as superblock (or differently: people who hold the experimental coin will receive shares of the superblock. Idk...maybe just a thought. Need to think about it again.
@2 The perspective is a growing community and a stable hashrate imho. This is more valuable than anything else.
@3 Not sure if that would be too complicated?
@Distribution
Basically my idea was that it is distributed via mining but that you can ALSO receive coin for being an active member of the community. I believe the problem with premine is, that there is huge part of the whole amount that can be dumped at any time. If we distributed the community premine like a faucet we would have one motor to keep community activities up. 10% was only a number. It could be anything. It could 2 or even 50%.