Hello, smaragda. I know you've had some thoughtful exchanges on here about the vote and funding. Can you explain why you voted "NO"?
Sure... I voted NO because the initial plan is straight-forward in regard to what happens with the unsold SWARM... the devs have two fundraising phases with an announced cap... if the cap isn't reached... remaining SWARM get distributed to the holders.
Locking the coins away without specifically stating what will happen to those coins if a second fundraising phase never takes place is unacceptable IMHO.
I agree with smaragda.
Plus, what if 4500 BTC is never reached....