i dont know... I'm asking? do we? maybe regulations are pointless?
Which group will regulations prevent from owning weapons, law abiding citizens or criminals?
Who would you prefer own weapons, law abiding citizens or criminals?
Does regulation create a lucrative black market where certain types of individuals are able to earn large sums of money by taking advantage of the lack of competition from law abiding citizens?
Do you think putting a weapon in the hands of an average, decent person makes them a cold blooded killer, ready to shoot anyone at the drop of a hat?
Does removing the ability to protect oneself from aggression create reliance on those in power to form a police state in order to keep the populace safe? Do they keep the populace safe?
you see.
its not so clear cut!
it could be regulations only sound good, when in fact, it only "...create a lucrative black market where certain types of individuals are able to earn large sums..."
its just to bad that bitcoin doesn't solve the problem, it only makes it worst.... but maybe that's a good thing
you can understand my confusion, I'm trying to understand why selling guns to anyone without asking any questions is a good thing.
I've got some weird ideas about guns, I'm Canadian.
Blame Canada-Southpark