Re: NEM Official Moderated Thread - Open Alpha Has Launched[Updates & Discussion]
I found more. P9 - BestofSR, cryptonikus, Deftonikus, Djentriser and TeseracT. Busted as socks on NODE.
All present on the NEM stakeholder list, haven't collected any tokens yet.
This looks pretty extensive. It's a good chance that all the socks on NODEs' list are probably on the NEM list. Seems like some had collected tokens (and presumably sold). The others can still be refunded.
All present on the NEM stakeholder list, haven't collected any tokens yet.
This looks pretty extensive. It's a good chance that all the socks on NODEs' list are probably on the NEM list. Seems like some had collected tokens (and presumably sold). The others can still be refunded.
another audit i think may be in the making here. or we just check all the socks that node uncovers.
socks around the world will be shaking in their boots! :L
Is the audit being done? I propose stopping issuing of the asset tokens, remove any sockpuppet possible and then restart again. Sockpuppets will get through but if they are known then its criminal to let them be.
I think the community should organize another audit of the stakeholder list. The dev team is too busy coding to do that and I think it would be really great if someone would take the initiative and get this done. Post-V1, the community needs to run NEM, so people should start taking some steps in that direction.
I propose:
1. A full validation of the stakeholder list. All account stakeholder should have a link to the original registration post next to their account.
2. A full redo of population statistics. All account stakeholder should have a post count next to their account.
3. All low post stakeholder need to be rechecked for sock puppets. ---> if there is no explanation then remove them from stakeholder list.
I totally agree with these proposals. Can someone/a group of people come forward and try to start working on this? If it is too hard to coordinate things here, please feel free to create a thread on http://forum.nemcoin.com/
I can coordinate this if some more people come forward. IMO this auditing should be done here because stakeholder accounts are bitcointalk accounts and they may be required to provide explanation etc.
If I am not qualified because I am not an original stakeholder, that is fine too but I did buy 2+ stakes in AE exchange. If someone has a secret method, feel free to pm but all auditing should be done in public in a clear transparent manner.
As a holder of NEMstake you are qualified, and not being an original stakeholder is probably a good thing because you will be less biased. You can probably get a few people to help if you start on something. We already did taint analysis before, but UP was involved in that (though I am not sure to what extent, because Patmast3r and some other user (sorry I forget the name, can someone remind me?) took the lead on that). If the community can do an independent audit, that would be good I think, though it should take a lot of time. Compiling pop stats and adding post counts, etc, seems like a good first step.
People were allowed up to 2 stakes (1 per account), because of stakes for loved ones, etc. I think that is why a lot of accounts were created just for NEM and then never heard from again. Part of it is because some people came to NEM that were not regular crypto users, so they may not come to BTT.
I will start doing a more indepth analysis of the stakeholder list, I'll discuss it more over here: http://forum.nemcoin.com/index.php?topic=2279.new#new