Can someone confirm what it looks like - that at the moment the entire CLOAK anon system is centralized and managed by the CLOAK devs? If so, then this project is very, very far behind Darkcoin. With Dark we are considering how, to have a point of failure at the moment (regardless of further ongoing anon development), a series of masternodes has to be compromised. But if I understand it correctly all an interested agency would have to do to compromise CLOAK 100% is knock on the dev's door. Is this correct?
That was just the method used for the short term. PoSA uses wallets that are actively staking as nodes for anonymizing transactions.
Sooo... does the amount you have staking affect the percentage of anon transactions you process? How does it work?