I was telling you to declare your self winner. 1/2 in jest.
If I ever claim some 'victory', and I don't offer defence, challenger wins.
I'll shake the hand of challenger if defeated on merit.

I have a habit of skipping words.
A quirky indulgence that leads to confusion when they turn out to be necessary for clarity.

what I intended to say, as briefly as possible.

I saw others post end of Q2 delivery.
I agreed with those posters.
I thought it was the popular view, I was biased because I  agreed.
Kudos to THEM for providing their view, of many theirs compelled me to agree.

I know I dis agreed with the "where seldom is heard a discouraging word" crowd.
Phoenix in particular. No idea if I ever stated same to provide proof.
His "Nobody" post is what I replied to. I'm willing to wear the nobody hat.
tolip forefits point.

I never had anything of mine to find.
I never intended to imply that.

If that is the metric I conceed defeat not victory.
Same goes for diggin for proof somebody said something I say I agree or disagree with.
People who do not believe end of Q2 was discussed WIN!!!

Poorly stated in an earlier post.
Clearer?


YMMV