I never understand how moderation policy work, sometime same reports got good and sometime same reports got bad because it's all depends who handle that reports, I mostly reports in Currency exchange, I really got some bad reports and never understand why.
I reported total 246 till now and accuracy is 90%.
I reported total 246 till now and accuracy is 90%.
The funny thing is my accuracy has stayed at 97% for well over the last month during most of those reports and I didn't notice my score go up or down. I must've got some bad ones for my score to have not gone up a percent. It seems I've had 50 bad reports all together so far.
Is it a problem if a user has a bad "report to mod" accuracy rate? I personally don't see an issue with this as long as the user is not going crazy (making, say 100's or other large amount of) reports that are clearly invalid, especially considering that it is not always obvious if something if against the rules, and some level of judgment needs to be used.
Define 'bad' accuracy rate. Having 0 probably is, but several mods have mentioned before that around 60% is considered a good score.
Wow, hilariousandco has 988 good reports in the past 60 days (16.5 per day). That is really impressive! 
Haha. I didn't realise it was that many. I guess I must be 'spamming' the reports too?
.